Re: streams, pmax

Article View: gnu.g++.bug

Article #711

#711

From: Peter R. Ham
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1990 22:09

11 lines
1057 bytes

I've seen this problem too. I think that the problem is that the rest
of the lines are pending output and foo->flush should clear them.
I don't think it should be necessary. Either the \n should cause
flushing or the destructor should. One of the maintainers of
libg++, I forget the name, said that he knew about the problem and
was still working on it.

--
Peter Ham			PO Box 3430	(h)(415) 322-4390
MS Computer Science Student	Stanford, CA	ham@cs.stanford.edu
Stanford University 		94309		(o)(415) 723-2067

Technical Details

Message-ID: <HAM.90Jan13140922@Neon.Stanford.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!shelby!neon!neon.Stanford.EDU!ham

References: <9001130258.AA00746@foobar.Colorado.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!shelby!neon!neon.Stanford.EDU!ham
From: ham@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Peter R. Ham)
Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug
Subject: Re: streams, pmax
Message-ID: <HAM.90Jan13140922@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 13 Jan 90 22:09:22 GMT
References: <9001130258.AA00746@foobar.Colorado.EDU>
Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 11
In-Reply-To: grunwald@FOOBAR.COLORADO.EDU's message of 13 Jan 90 02:58:52 GMT

Reply to Parent Message