No bug: was bug in 2.2.2 - object as function arguments ?? - Article 981 - go-pugleaf

Article View: gnu.g++.bug

Article #981

No bug: was bug in 2.2.2 - object as function arguments ??

#981

From: David Kastrup
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 09:26

7 lines
969 bytes

Same problem as mentioned before. Since temporary objects are not
guaranteed to exist ANYTIME after their explicit use, passing of
pointers from temporary objects is illegal. This is sad because
it complicates things as in the sample, but as is shown clearly
in the ARM, only a garbage collection mechanism can be smart enough
to guarantee temps exist until all references cease. And c++
hasn't such.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <dak.717499574@kaa>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!kaa.informatik.rwth-aachen.de!dak

References: <1992Sep23.051536.4188@nuscc.nus.sg>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!kaa.informatik.rwth-aachen.de!dak
From: dak@kaa.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (David Kastrup)
Subject: No bug: was bug in 2.2.2 - object as function arguments ??
Message-ID: <dak.717499574@kaa>
Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
Organization: Rechnerbetrieb Informatik  /  RWTH Aachen
References: <1992Sep23.051536.4188@nuscc.nus.sg>
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 09:26:14 GMT
Approved: bug-g++@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message