🚀 go-pugleaf

I believe I have the same problem as Mr D. Vladicic in his 
contribution "C++ constructor problem"

I have a case when a static initialization of the form:

#include "Package.hh"
static Package* pac1 = new Package("pac 1");

will work but this:

static Package pac2("pac 2");

won`t work 'cause the linker complaines about __$_9Package
as an undefined symbol. I don't quite get it why the former
works and the latter won't. Both initializations are
swallowed by the compiler.
The class Package is separately compiled, but that shouldn't
affect the result, should it?
I use g++ 2.2 and am running on a Sun Sparc1.

I can do with the pointer initialization but it's irritating
nevertheless...

O----------------------------O----------------------------------O
| Jonas Svanberg             | Email: svan@isy.liu.se           |
| Div. of Information Theory O----------------------------------O
| Department of E.E. (ISY)   | "And Noah said to the animals:   | 
| Linkoping University       |  - Go out and multiply!          |  
| S-581 83 Linkoping         |  The snake said:                 |
| SWEDEN                     |  - But how can I? I'm an adder!" |
O----------------------------O----------------------------------O