Article View: gnu.g++.help
Article #54Re: static vals inside a class are unresolved (g++ 2.0/SunOS4.1.1)
From: Tal Lewis Lancaster
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 00:00
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 00:00
14 lines
1145 bytes
1145 bytes
mccrory@tomato.fnal.gov (Elliott McCrory) writes: >Seems like a kludge. Why has static been abandoned? Well, I got the idea of my so called "kludge" from p. 179 the ARM: "A static member is not part of objects of a class. Static members of a global class have external linkage. The declaration of a static data member in its class declaration is NOT a definition. A definition is required elsewhere." As a side note the "kludge" isn't needed when using ATT 3.0. Tal
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr11.000057.4061@cco.caltech.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!tllReferences:
<MCCRORY.92Apr9161630@tomato.fnal.gov> <1992Apr9.234910.7629@cco.caltech.edu> <MCCRORY.92Apr10161734@tomato.fnal.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.g++.help Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!tll From: tll@cco.caltech.edu (Tal Lewis Lancaster) Subject: Re: static vals inside a class are unresolved (g++ 2.0/SunOS4.1.1) Message-ID: <1992Apr11.000057.4061@cco.caltech.edu> Sender: news@cco.caltech.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: jomby Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena References: <MCCRORY.92Apr9161630@tomato.fnal.gov> <1992Apr9.234910.7629@cco.caltech.edu> <MCCRORY.92Apr10161734@tomato.fnal.gov> Distribution: gnu Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 00:00:57 GMT Lines: 15