Re: libg++ v2.2 and gcc v2.3

Article View: gnu.g++.help

Article #594

#594

From: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 19:47

7 lines
756 bytes

In article <9211202008.AA07759@mail0191.Phibro.COM>, murphyp@phibro.com writes:
|> Are they compatible or should I wait for v2.3 of the library?

No. You should wait for libg++ 2.3 and gcc 2.3.2/2.4.


H.J.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov21.194711.20699@serval.net.wsu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!serval!hlu

References: <9211202008.AA07759@mail0191.Phibro.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!serval!hlu
From: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Newsgroups: gnu.g++.help,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: libg++ v2.2 and gcc v2.3
Message-ID: <1992Nov21.194711.20699@serval.net.wsu.edu>
Date: 21 Nov 92 19:47:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1992Nov21.194711.20699
References: <9211202008.AA07759@mail0191.Phibro.COM>
Sender: news@serval.net.wsu.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: School of EECS, Washington State University
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message