🚀 go-pugleaf

shankar@mti.sgi.com (Shankar Unni) writes:

>There *is* a known bug that I found recently (for which there won't be a fix
>in Irix 6.2, since we found the problem too late to get into that release - it
>will be fixed in a patch), where if you declare a template member function
>in the following way, it's NOT inlined:

>  template <class T> class Foo {
>      ...
>      void memfunc();	/* no inline specification here */
>      ...
>  };

>  template <class T> inline Foo<T>::memfunc()
>  {
>    /* defined as inline, but compiler will fail to inline it */
>  }


>The workaround for this problem is to stick the inline keyword before the
>declaration of the member function inside the template class.

Is there any similar problem with inlining non-member template functions?
What is the easiest way to tell if a function actually did get inlined?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laurence G. Yaffe		lgy@phys.washington.edu
University of Washington	1-206-543-3902 (fax: 1-206-543-9523)