Article View: gnu.g++.lib.bug
Article #168Re: lack of inline functions in libg++
From: George Beshers
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1989 18:10
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1989 18:10
10 lines
857 bytes
857 bytes
I agree with Dirk's sentiment and would add another very important reason: templates (e.g., generics). I recently have been programming a great deal in NJML which is basically SML. The experience has been *very* rewarding except for the size/time requirements of the system. Basically, I have yet to write a piece of code twice because of some change in typing---a major accomplishment in terms of code reuse!! George Beshers beshers@uconn.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8910271810.AA02242@brcsun2.uconn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brcsun2.uconn.edu!beshersShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brcsun2.uconn.edu!beshers From: beshers@brcsun2.uconn.edu (George Beshers) Newsgroups: gnu.g++.lib.bug Subject: Re: lack of inline functions in libg++ Message-ID: <8910271810.AA02242@brcsun2.uconn.edu> Date: 27 Oct 89 18:10:38 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 10