Article View: gnu.g++.lib.bug
Article #25Plans on iostream-lib
From: Marc van Woerkom
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 23:29
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 23:29
32 lines
1587 bytes
1587 bytes
Hello!
I have some questions on the future of the I/O part of libg++:
* To me, the iostream concept is much more appealing than the stdio
stuff from C. But the current implementation is not behaving well
enough, to forget stdio. I encounterd problems with manipulators,
random positioning and binary I/O.
-> Is it a future goal, to make the iostream package more compatible
with cfront's one? (e.g. the examples in Stroustrup's C++PL2)
-> Are there plans for a 'binary filemode', to allow more general
I/O?
-> Is it possible to extend the documentation with some examples?
(I'm using the emx port of gcc-2.1 with libg++-2.2, and it's
sometimes hard to figure out the UNIX customs..)
-> Do you think it's realistic to do all I/O with the iostream
package or will there still be need for C way?
Bye, Marc
Marc van Woerkom ****** Aachen Center for Solidification in Space *******
ACCESS e.V., Intzestr. 5 E-Mail: marc@pxcl1.gi.rwth-aachen.de
D-5100 Aachen, Germany Marc_van-Woerkom@ac3.maus.de
Fax: +49 241 38578 "Trust me, I know what I'm doing!" (Sledge Hammer)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9208031929.AA01960@pxcl1.gi.rwth-aachen.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pxcl1.gi.rwth-aachen.de!marcShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.g++.lib.bug Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pxcl1.gi.rwth-aachen.de!marc From: marc@pxcl1.gi.rwth-aachen.de (Marc van Woerkom) Subject: Plans on iostream-lib Message-ID: <9208031929.AA01960@pxcl1.gi.rwth-aachen.de> Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Distribution: gnu Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1992 23:29:41 GMT Approved: bug-lib-g++@prep.ai.mit.edu Lines: 34