🚀 go-pugleaf

OS: m68k System Vr3 Unix
Compiler: gcc-2.1
Version: libg++-2.0

I have succesfully compiled and linked gcc/g++ 2.1 on our system. The next
step was to build libg++. There was some descrepancy between the stdio.h
int g++-include and the one in the compilers directory so I changed that
and libg++ compiled successfully. When I try to do "make check" I get
the following output:

gcc  -DLO_CAL -I. -I./../../iostream -I./../../g++-include -v -DUSG -c version.cc 
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hkv/2.1/specs 
gcc version 2.1 
 /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hkv/2.1/cpp -lang-c++ -v -DLO_CAL -DUSG -I. -I./../../iostream -I./../../g++-include -undef -D__GNUC__=2 -D__GNUG__=2 -D__cplusplus -Dmc68000 -Dmc68k -Dm68k -Dunix -D__mc68000__ -D__mc68k__ -D__m68k__ -D__unix__ -D__mc68000 -D__mc68k -D__m68k -D__unix -D__HAVE_68881__ -Dmc68020 version.cc /usr/tmp/cca09579.i 
GNU CPP version 2.1 (68k, MIT syntax) 
 /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hkv/2.1/cc1plus /usr/tmp/cca09579.i -quiet -dumpbase version.cc -version -o /usr/tmp/cca09579.s 
GNU C++ version 2.1 (68k, MIT syntax) compiled by GNU C version 2.1. 
 /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hkv/2.1/as -mc68020 -o version.o /usr/tmp/cca09579.s 
gcc -o gperf new.o options.o iterator.o main.o gen-perf.o key-list.o list-node.o hash-table.o bool-array.o read-line.o std-err.o version.o  ../../libg++.a 
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hkv/2.1/specs 
gcc version 2.1 
 /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hkv/2.1/ld -o gperf /lib/crt0.o -L/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hkv/2.1/ -L/usr/local/lib/ new.o options.o iterator.o main.o gen-perf.o key-list.o list-node.o hash-table.o bool-array.o read-line.o std-err.o version.o ../../libg++.a -lgcc -lc -lgcc 
undefined                       first referenced 
 symbol                             in file 
libgxx_bcopy__FPCvPvUl              ../../libg++.a 
ld fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to gperf 
collect: /bin/ld returned 13 exit status 

I am assuming that the mangled name with "bcopy" is due to some BSD/SYSV
difference in memory routines but I don't know where to go to fix it. As
you see I have compiled with -DUSG. Do I need another flag for SYSV ?
Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.