Re: Failed test-install in libg++-2.0 if compiled with gcc-2.1

Article View: gnu.g++.lib.bug

Article #42

#42

From: bothner
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 10:55

14 lines
1015 bytes

>Does this mean that gcc and NIHCL are and will remain incomapable??

NIHCL should be re-written to not depend on being able to
"run something after the initializers but before main()".  This is
not supported by AT&T's compiler either; my understanding is that
NIHCL uses some non-portable kludge.  My impressions is that
Gorlen has agreed that NIHCL could and should be fixed to not
need this kludge; I don't know any specifics.

To summarize: the bug is/was in NIHCL, not gcc; the fix should
be there as well.

	--Per Bothner
Cygnus Support     bothner@cygnus.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9204090055.AA22896@cygnus.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!cygnus.com!bothner

References: <181@colossus.mct-aria>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.g++.lib.bug
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!cygnus.com!bothner
From: bothner@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Failed test-install in libg++-2.0 if compiled with gcc-2.1
Message-ID: <9204090055.AA22896@cygnus.com>
Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
References: <181@colossus.mct-aria>
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 10:55:57 GMT
Approved: bug-lib-g++@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message