Article View: gnu.g++
Article #141Re: Query on using libg++ with AT&T's C++ translator
From: Paul Nordstrom
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1989 13:26
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1989 13:26
21 lines
1160 bytes
1160 bytes
In article <1989Sep27.223222.26655@odi.com> dlw@odi.com writes: > >If you're really trying to compile libg++ using AT&T's C++, you have a >lot more problems ahead of you. g++ is not compatible with C++. g++ >even has lexical tokens that are not present in C++. So don't expect > . . . >Dan Weinreb Object Design, Inc. dlw@odi.com What is the extent of these differences? Is it feasible to write code to run under both compilers? Has the differences between the two compilers widened or narrowed with the introduction of 2.0? Are "incompatible" ( :-) ) features being added to g++ on an ongoing basis? -- Paul Nordstrom Gill & Co., L.P. uunet!gill!paul
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<684@gill.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!gill!paulReferences:
<1503@novavax.UUCP> <1989Sep27.223222.26655@odi.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!gill!paul From: paul@gill.UUCP (Paul Nordstrom) Newsgroups: gnu.g++,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Query on using libg++ with AT&T's C++ translator Message-ID: <684@gill.UUCP> Date: 28 Sep 89 13:26:15 GMT References: <1503@novavax.UUCP> <1989Sep27.223222.26655@odi.com> Reply-To: paul@gill.UUCP (Paul Nordstrom) Followup-To: gnu.g++ Organization: Gill & Co., L.P., San Francisco Lines: 21