🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4g0boe$c37@maverick.tad.eds.com> venkat@nemesis.pln.rboc.eds.com (User Jdsmith) writes:

> I am experiencing a problem with overloading the 
> new operator when allocating an array of classes.

You need two functions - which can also be defined on a per-class basis:

	void *operator new(size_t size);
	void *operator new[](size_t size);

> I assumed that the overloaded new operator would be called with the
> number of bytes (the first parameter) being set to:
> 
> sizeof(class) * arrayCount

This is true - also for the new[] operator.
-- 
"We need a plan to diverge from", Fesser
--
.---------------------------------------------------------.
| Lars Toeffner-Clausen         e-mail: lastec@dmi.min.dk |
| Oersted Science Data Center   Phone: +45 3915 7497      |
| Lyngbyvej 100                 Fax: +45 3915 7460        |
| DK - 2100 Koebenhavn Oe                                 |
`---------------------------------------------------------'