Should INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD be bigger for RISC's?

Article View: gnu.gcc.bug

Article #1759

#1759

From: Ron Guilmette
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 1988 17:35

14 lines
915 bytes

This isn't really a bug.  At worst, it could only be called a "non-feature".

In GCC 1.28, the file integrate.c contains the following:

/* Default max number of insns a function can have and still be inline.
   This is overridden on RISC machines.  */
#ifndef INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD
#define INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD(DECL) ...
#endif

I grepped for the symbol INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD in all the sources and I
found only this one definition of it.  Since the comment says it should
be overridden for RISC machines, then why isn't it?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8810061735.AA05399@nsc.NSC.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!mcdchg!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!nsc.nsc.com!rfg

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!mcdchg!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!nsc.nsc.com!rfg
From: rfg@nsc.nsc.com (Ron Guilmette)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
Subject: Should INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD be bigger for RISC's?
Message-ID: <8810061735.AA05399@nsc.NSC.COM>
Date: 6 Oct 88 17:35:59 GMT
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 14