Article View: gnu.gcc.bug
Article #1765Should INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD be bigger for RISC's?
From: Michael Tiemann
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 1988 00:18
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 1988 00:18
23 lines
1304 bytes
1304 bytes
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 88 10:35:59 PDT
From: Ron Guilmette <rfg@nsc.nsc.com>
This isn't really a bug. At worst, it could only be called a "non-feature".
In GCC 1.28, the file integrate.c contains the following:
/* Default max number of insns a function can have and still be inline.
This is overridden on RISC machines. */
#ifndef INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD
#define INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD(DECL) ...
#endif
I grepped for the symbol INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD in all the sources and I
found only this one definition of it. Since the comment says it should
be overridden for RISC machines, then why isn't it?
It was put in very recently, and I have not had access to a RISC
machine since. That problem should be aleviated soon.
Michael
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8810090018.AA13771@lurch.stanford.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!killer!mit-eddie!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!LURCH.STANFORD.EDU!tiemannReferences:
<8810061735.AA05399@nsc.NSC.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!killer!mit-eddie!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!LURCH.STANFORD.EDU!tiemann From: tiemann@LURCH.STANFORD.EDU (Michael Tiemann) Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug Subject: Should INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD be bigger for RISC's? Message-ID: <8810090018.AA13771@lurch.stanford.edu> Date: 9 Oct 88 00:18:48 GMT References: <8810061735.AA05399@nsc.NSC.COM> Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Reply-To: tiemann@lurch.stanford.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 22