Re: '386 gcc bug for 1.28

Article View: gnu.gcc.bug

Article #1817

#1817

From: James Van Artsdalen
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 1988 22:49

11 lines
825 bytes

In <4871@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>, zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (Jon Zeeff) wrote:

> The following code produces an invalid instruction: [...]

> 	imulw $15073,%bx   <- error

I believe this is a valid 386 instruction.  I think the bug is in the
assembler.
-- 
James R. Van Artsdalen      james@bigtex.cactus.org      "Live Free or Die"
Home: 512-346-2444 Work: 338-8789       9505 Arboretum Blvd Austin TX 78759

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9487@bigtex.cactus.org>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!killer!texbell!bigtex!james

References: <4871@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!killer!texbell!bigtex!james
From: james@bigtex.cactus.org (James Van Artsdalen)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
Subject: Re: '386 gcc bug for 1.28
Message-ID: <9487@bigtex.cactus.org>
Date: 18 Oct 88 22:49:32 GMT
References: <4871@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>
Reply-To: james@bigtex.cactus.org (James Van Artsdalen)
Organization: F.B.N. Software, Austin TX
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message