🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <8810220131.AA00312@ucsci.ucsc.edu>,
dsgn047@UCSCI.UCSC.EDU (10017047) writes:
> 2)  Loop optimization.  GCC 1.30 does *not* get rid of empty for loops;
> does anybody know why? (I.e., 'for (a=0;a<100;a++);' is executed in its
> entirety.)

I would find it sheer lunacy to have that loop eliminated in favor of a=100.
That type of loop is used QUIET often for DELAY loops.  Try writing a driver
sometime where you need a delay loop, and see what happens when "a=100" is
all that's generated with no delay.