Re: GCC 1.30 complaints

Article View: gnu.gcc.bug

Article #1843

#1843

From: Miles Bader
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 1988 12:33

14 lines
764 bytes

ulysses!hector!ekrell@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu  (Eduardo Krell) writes:
> bader+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU (Miles Bader) writes:
> 
> >a=100; /* look ma, no loop! */
> 
> Great. Now, what about
> 
>         for(a=1;a<=100;a=foo(a));
> 
> Where foo is a function defined elsewhere.

Then you generate the loop.  It's not nearly the same case.

-Miles

Technical Details

Message-ID: <gXMmAey00UkaIDpX4S@andrew.cmu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ANDREW.CMU.EDU!bader+

References: <10756@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ANDREW.CMU.EDU!bader+
From: bader+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU (Miles Bader)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
Subject: Re: GCC 1.30 complaints
Message-ID: <gXMmAey00UkaIDpX4S@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 24 Oct 88 12:33:46 GMT
References: <10756@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message