🚀 go-pugleaf

Although the construct below isn't valid (*ip++ and ip have to match
because of the "0" constraint -- this is the result of only partly
undoing a workaround for a bug in 1.31), the compiler should print a
warning rather than dumping core.  (This is both with and without
optimization.)

-- Ken

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

extern int i, *jp, j;
foo ()
{
	volatile int *ip = jp;
	for (i=0; i < j ; i++) {
		asm volatile ("extzv %1,$1,%2,%0"
			      : "g" (*ip++)
			      : "g" (i), "g" (*jp), "0" (ip));
	}
}

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~