🚀 go-pugleaf

1.  A few days ago, I reported a bug in trying to compile GCC.

2.  Upon learning that we will obtain new sources, I guessed that this bug
    report is irrelevant, and sent a message suggesting that you ignore the
    first report.

3.  The second message bounced.  This is incredible.  I am on CSNET,
    diamond@csl.sony.jp
    You are on CSNET, and I used the command:
    mail bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu
    What is all this other nonsense in the bounced message?!  It is
    appended below.

4.  Naturally, I have had many other messages bounce for random and
    unguessable reasons, but not when a trivial CSNET transit was being
    attempted.

5.  Desperately awaiting arrival of gmail.

-- Norman Diamond

--------- bounced message follows after one null line ----------

From @RELAY.CS.NET,@ecsgate.uncecs.edu:MAILER-DAEMON@uncecs.edu Tue Jan 10 10:33:47 1989
Received: from socslgw.csl.sony.junet by diamond.csl.sony.junet (4.0/6.3Junet-1.0)
	id AA00200; Tue, 10 Jan 89 10:33:43 JST
Received: from relay.cs.net by socslgw.csl.sony.junet (4.0/6.3Junet-1.0)
	id AA18145; Tue, 10 Jan 89 02:25:04 JST
Return-Path: <@RELAY.CS.NET,@ecsgate.uncecs.edu:MAILER-DAEMON@uncecs.edu>
Received: from relay.cs.net by RELAY.CS.NET id ac21305; 9 Jan 89 3:52 EST
Received: from ecsgate.uncecs.edu by RELAY.CS.NET id aa12913; 9 Jan 89 3:56 EST
Received: from ecsvax.uncecs.edu by ecsgate.uncecs.edu (5.54/UNCECS/8-30-88)
	id AA17250; Mon, 9 Jan 89 03:54:27 EST
Received: by ecsvax.uncecs.edu (5.57/UNCECS/03-10-88)
	id AA17690; Mon, 9 Jan 89 03:53:55 EST
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 89 03:53:55 EST
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@uncecs.edu>
Subject: Returned mail: unknown mailer error 101
Message-Id: <8901090853.AA17690@ecsvax.uncecs.edu>
To: @RELAY.CS.NET:diamond@csl.sony.junet
Mmdf-Warning:  Parse error in original version of preceding line at RELAY.CS.NET
Status: R

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
bad system name: uncw
uux failed. code 101
554 uncw!spell... unknown mailer error 101

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by ecsvax.uncecs.edu (5.57/UNCECS/03-10-88)
	id AA17604; Mon, 9 Jan 89 03:53:55 EST
Received: from RELAY.CS.NET by prep.ai.mit.edu; Mon, 9 Jan 89 03:20:29 EST
Received: from relay2.cs.net by RELAY.CS.NET id af12514; 9 Jan 89 3:20 EST
Received: from csl.sony.jp by RELAY.CS.NET id af21073; 9 Jan 89 3:08 EST
Received: from diamond.csl.sony.junet by socslgw.csl.sony.junet (4.0/6.3Junet-1.0)
	id AA15105; Mon, 9 Jan 89 12:43:32 JST
Received: by diamond.csl.sony.junet (4.0/6.3Junet-1.0)
	id AA00290; Mon, 9 Jan 89 12:43:36 JST
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 89 12:43:36 JST
From: Norman Diamond <diamond@csl.sony.jp>
Return-Path: <diamond@csl.sony.jp>
Message-Id: <8901090343.AA00290@diamond.csl.sony.junet>
To: bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu

To:    GNU gcc bug department
       bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu

From:  Norman Diamond, Sony Computer Science Laboratory
       diamond@csl.sony.jp
       diamond%csl.sony.jp@relay.cs.net

Date:  1989.01.09


Please ignore bug report of 1989.01.07.  I am told that we will receive
newer sources later this week.

I also hope that we will receive newer sources for G++, and hope they
will not have non-existent predicate-type macros on the left of an
assignment operator....

-- Norman Diamond