Re: GCC version number in .o files -- bad idea

Article View: gnu.gcc.bug

Article #2391

#2391

From: Joe Weening
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1989 05:25

6 lines
933 bytes

The assembler creates .o files, not GCC.  I can't think of any change
one can make to GCC that will affect whether .o files are time-stamped.
--

Joe Weening                                Computer Science Dept.
weening@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU          Stanford University

Technical Details

Message-ID: <WEENING.89Mar14212528@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!polya!weening

References: <8903142103.AA18095@riunite.aca.mcc.com> <15625@princeton.Princeton.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!polya!weening
From: weening@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU (Joe Weening)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
Subject: Re: GCC version number in .o files -- bad idea
Message-ID: <WEENING.89Mar14212528@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 15 Mar 89 05:25:28 GMT
References: <8903142103.AA18095@riunite.aca.mcc.com> <15625@princeton.Princeton.EDU>
Sender: USENET News System <news@polya.Stanford.EDU>
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
Lines: 6
In-reply-to: drh@notecnirp.Princeton.EDU's message of 15 Mar 89 01:52:35 GMT

Reply to Parent Message