Article View: gnu.gcc.bug
Article #2399Re: GCC version number in .o files -- bad idea
From: Dave Hanson
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1989 12:51
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1989 12:51
8 lines
859 bytes
859 bytes
In article <WEENING.89Mar14212528@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU> weening@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU (Joe Weening) writes: The assembler creates .o files, not GCC. I can't think of any change one can make to GCC that will affect whether .o files are time-stamped. .asciz "gcc version 1.34.0/Wed Mar 15 07:49:48 EST 1989" stamps the .o file regardless of object format.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15627@princeton.Princeton.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!rutgers!njin!princeton!notecnirp!drhShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!rutgers!njin!princeton!notecnirp!drh From: drh@notecnirp.Princeton.EDU (Dave Hanson) Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug Subject: Re: GCC version number in .o files -- bad idea Message-ID: <15627@princeton.Princeton.EDU> Date: 15 Mar 89 12:51:58 GMT Sender: news@princeton.Princeton.EDU Reply-To: drh@notecnirp.UUCP (Dave Hanson) Distribution: gnu Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Princeton University Lines: 8