🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gcc.bug
Article #2401

Re: GCC version number in .o files -- bad idea

#2401
From: gnu
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1989 20:14
9 lines
883 bytes
GCC should not put extraneous differences into files that would otherwise
be identical.  If you upgrade from gcc-1.xx to gcc-1.yy and run a regression
test, only the files whose assembler code actually changes should show
up as different.  This is a major botch in "coff", where they put
a timestamp in the object files, and you have to take special precautions
to try to compare two versions of object code, e.g. to see if a compiler
fix has changed anything.

	John Gilmore
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8903142014.AA27229@hop.toad.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!toad.com!gnu
References: <8903101710.AA09972@prep.ai.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!toad.com!gnu
From: gnu@toad.com
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
Subject: Re: GCC version number in .o files -- bad idea
Message-ID: <8903142014.AA27229@hop.toad.com>
Date: 14 Mar 89 20:14:46 GMT
References: <8903101710.AA09972@prep.ai.mit.edu>
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 9