🚀 go-pugleaf

Here follows a template bug related to const member functions. If
'const' is removed or the definition is kept within the class
declaration everything works OK.

/jonas


template<class T> class X {
public:
  int f() const;
};

template<class T> int X<T>::f() const {
  return 0;
}

main(){
  X<int> x;
}


gcc 2.1 and 2.2.1 complains as follows:

/u/jonas/z.cc: In function `int  main ()':
/u/jonas/z.cc:5: template for method `f' doesn't match any in class `X<int>'