Article View: gnu.gcc.bug
Article #2623Transcendental functions
From: rms
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 20:47
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 20:47
8 lines
816 bytes
816 bytes
How many people would like to see built-in support for transcendental functions in GCC? This would mean adding new rtl codes, new optabs, new standard pattern names, and adding numerous patterns to all the machine descriptions to take advantage of the feature. I hesitate to install so much change unless there is real enthusiasm for it. Note that the built-in functions would fail to set errno and therefore would not be compatible with ANSI C.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8905112047.AA00256@sugar-bombs.ai.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!AI.MIT.EDU!rmsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!AI.MIT.EDU!rms From: rms@AI.MIT.EDU Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug Subject: Transcendental functions Message-ID: <8905112047.AA00256@sugar-bombs.ai.mit.edu> Date: 11 May 89 20:47:02 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 8