Re: Building XQvss with GCC 1.35?

Article View: gnu.gcc.bug

Article #2708

#2708

From: Dirk Grunwald
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 1989 15:23

8 lines
910 bytes

this is, I think, an Xqvss bug, not a gcc bug.

whoever cobbled together the Xqvss driver made unsafe assumptions
about the optimizer - in particular, you have to compile everything
with -fvolatile & even then I'm not certain it will work properly.
--
Dirk Grunwald -- Univ. of Illinois 		  (grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <GRUNWALD.89Jun6102305@flute.cs.uiuc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!uxc!garcon!garcon.cso.uiuc.edu!grunwald

References: <1567@cunixc.cc.columbia.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!uxc!garcon!garcon.cso.uiuc.edu!grunwald
From: grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu (Dirk Grunwald)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Building XQvss with GCC 1.35?
Message-ID: <GRUNWALD.89Jun6102305@flute.cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: 6 Jun 89 15:23:05 GMT
References: <1567@cunixc.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: news@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu
Reply-To: grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu
Organization: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 8
In-reply-to: ben@cunixc.cc.columbia.edu's message of 5 Jun 89 23:12:01 GMT

Reply to Parent Message