more details on possible bug

Article View: gnu.gcc.bug

Article #30

#30

From: Richard Stallman
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1992 20:25

6 lines
735 bytes

      Of the three direct responses I recieved to my bug
      report, two (this includes yours) were negative in
      nature.

It seems unfair to judge the FSF according to messages
sent by people who have nothing to do with the FSF.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9211010625.AA08282@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms

References: <199210312331.AA25638@spot.Colorado.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms
From: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman)
Subject: more details on possible bug
Message-ID: <9211010625.AA08282@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
References: <199210312331.AA25638@spot.Colorado.EDU>
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1992 20:25:48 GMT
Approved: bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message