🚀 go-pugleaf

Arne,

>Yes, that is correct, but it's only one of the comparisons. This code:
>
>int map(c)
>	unsigned char c;
>{
>	c >= 0;
>}
>
>will give the same warning. I can't read the assembly (never
>understood it), but I suspect the actual comparison with 0 will never
>be done. (Regardless of optimization maybe).
>
>I'm afraid warnings on code produced by web->tangle->web2c->c will
>never be very informational or productive.

Ah, now I understand what the warning was about.  Since 'c' is of an
unsigned type, it is by definition always '>= 0' - obviously!  So,
the warning was proper.

Sorry to bother everyone.

Thanks

Tom Shields