🚀 go-pugleaf

Is the following a bug or do I need some compiler directive to use 
"varargs" from c++ code ? 

The version of stdarg.h is from the gcc distribution kit.

The following code when compiled with gcc 2.2.2 (This is a .cc file) 
generates undefined for branch labels


	#include <stdarg.h>

	extern "C" {

	void test(int stat, ...)
	{
	    va_list ap;
	    int key;

	    va_start(ap, stat); 
	    while (key = va_arg(ap, int)) {
	      printf("Key is %d \n", key);
	    }
	    va_end(ap);
	}
     
	}


cesium% !gcc
gcc -v -g -c -DGCC -DSUN -DSUN4 -DUNIX -o foo.o foo.cc
Reading specs from /usr/local/gcc-2.2/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-sunos4.1/2.2.2/specs
gcc version 2.2.2
 /usr/local/gcc-2.2/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-sunos4.1/2.2.2/cpp -lang-c++ -v -DGCC -DSUN -DSUN4 -DUNIX -undef -D__GNUC__=2 -D__GNUG__=2 -D__cplusplus -Dsparc -Dsun -Dunix -D__sparc__ -D__sun__ -D__unix__ -D__sparc -D__sun -D__unix -g foo.cc /tmp/cca25800.i
GNU CPP version 2.2.2 (sparc)
 /usr/local/gcc-2.2/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-sunos4.1/2.2.2/cc1plus /tmp/cca25800.i -fno-builtin -quiet -dumpbase foo.cc -g -version -o /tmp/cca25800.s
GNU C++ version 2.2.2 (sparc) compiled by GNU C version 2.2.2.
foo.cc: In function `void  test (int, ...)':
foo.cc:12: warning: implicit declaration of function `printf'
 as -o foo.o /tmp/cca25800.s
cesium% !nm
nm foo.o
         U LBB5
         U LBE5
         U ___builtin_saveregs
         U _printf
0000000c T _test
00000000 t gcc2_compiled.
cesium%