🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <9207282135.AA11012@etamin.crd.Ge.Com> nguyen@sol.crd.ge.com writes:
>The following code compiles with AT&T but not with GNU g++2.0
>(gcc-2.2.2). Who is wrong?

gcc/g++ is wrong, but it's not surprising given the ambiguity of some of
the template specs. If you change the problem line in your template class
definition from

>template<class T1, class T2>
>class foo{
>public:
>  T1 value1;
>  T2 value2;
>  foo(T1 a, T2 b) { value1 = a; value2 = b;}
>  void bar(foo<T1,T2>& t) { value1 = t.value1; value2 = t.value2;} //********
>  void print() { cout << value1 << " " << value2 << endl;}
>};

to

	...
  void bar(foo& t) { value1 = t.value1; value2 = t.value2;}
	...

your program compiles, runs, and produces the right answers.


--
Joe Buck	jbuck@ohm.berkeley.edu