🚀 go-pugleaf

Sorry for sending this to bug-gcc, but I've tried twice to send it to
bug-gas (an address I verified from an Internet machine and
prep.ai.mit.edu accepted both "bug-gas" and "bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu"
as recipients) and had it bounce twice.

=========================== BUG 1 =============================
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 89 03:10:54 -0400
From: uunet!MAILER-DAEMON (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
To: bsw!adam

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>>> RCPT To:<bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu>
<<< 550 <bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu>... User unknown
550 bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu... User unknown: Inappropriate ioctl for device

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: from bsw.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP 
	id AA00190; Thu, 14 Sep 89 03:10:54 -0400
Received: by helium.bsw.com (5.51/ardeb:5.19)
	id AA07773; Wed, 13 Sep 89 12:54:26 PDT
Received: by promethium.bsw.com.bsw.com (3.2/SMI-3.2:ardeb:1)
	id AA01597; Wed, 13 Sep 89 13:28:38 PDT
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 89 13:28:38 PDT
From: bsw!adam (Adam de Boor)
Message-Id: <8909132028.AA01597@promethium.bsw.com>
To: bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu
Subject: [uunet!MAILER-DAEMON: Returned mail: User unknown]

You might want to find out why this bounced...

a

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 89 03:06:26 -0400
From: uunet!MAILER-DAEMON (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
To: bsw!adam

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>>> RCPT To:<bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu>
<<< 550 <bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu>... User unknown
550 bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu... User unknown: Inappropriate ioctl for device

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: from bsw.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP 
	id AA07767; Wed, 13 Sep 89 03:06:26 -0400
Received: by helium.bsw.com (5.51/ardeb:5.19)
	id AA03551; Tue, 12 Sep 89 13:17:32 PDT
Received: by promethium.bsw.com.bsw.com (3.2/SMI-3.2:ardeb:1)
	id AA04752; Tue, 12 Sep 89 13:17:33 PDT
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 89 13:17:33 PDT
From: bsw!adam (Adam de Boor)
Message-Id: <8909122017.AA04752@promethium.bsw.com>
To: bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu
Subject: bug in sparc-opcode.h

the opcodes given for several of the modes of the std instruction are
incorrect. Specifically those for the register+immediate as
destination. The affected lines are:

{ "std",	0xc1f82000, 0xc1382000,	"g,[1+i]",  0 },
{ "std",	0xc1f82000, 0xc1302000,	"q,[1+i]",  0 },
{ "std",	0xc1f82000, 0xc1b82000,	"D,[1+i]",  0 },
{ "std",	0xc1f82000, 0xc1b02000,	"Q,[1+i]",  1 },


In all these cases, the 4th nibble was 0 and should have been 2.

a


=========================== BUG 2 =============================
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 89 03:12:13 -0400
From: uunet!MAILER-DAEMON (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
To: bsw!adam

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>>> RCPT To:<bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu>
<<< 550 <bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu>... User unknown
550 bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu... User unknown: Inappropriate ioctl for device

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: from bsw.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP 
	id AA00421; Thu, 14 Sep 89 03:12:13 -0400
Received: by helium.bsw.com (5.51/ardeb:5.19)
	id AA08300; Wed, 13 Sep 89 16:16:59 PDT
Received: by promethium.bsw.com.bsw.com (3.2/SMI-3.2:ardeb:1)
	id AA02386; Wed, 13 Sep 89 16:51:13 PDT
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 89 16:51:13 PDT
From: bsw!adam (Adam de Boor)
Message-Id: <8909132351.AA02386@promethium.bsw.com>
To: bug-gas@prep.ai.mit.edu
Subject: ".single" pseudo-op

the sparc implementation of gcc produces .single directives where gas
expects .float directives. I think .single should be added to the
md_pseudo_ops table in sparc.c, as one cannot change gcc (or it
wouldn't work with sun as, I don't think).

a