🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <199612010425.XAA09048@cutter-john.mit.edu>,
Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu> wrote:
> I've recently observed some free software authors use the
> justification "it shuts up gcc" when asked why they declare main() as
> void.  (Presumably, they're using -Wall).  Since "void main" is not
> correct according to ANSI, I would appreciate it if the next version
> of gcc could warn about it.  I would advocate warning about it in all
> cases, but warning about it only when -Wall is set is fine.

I second this.  And it's not just fee software authors that do this;
I've seen it in commercial software.