non-bug003 (order of auto-increment)

Article View: gnu.gcc.bug

Article #656

#656

From: Andrew Klossner
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1989 14:37

12 lines
900 bytes

rajeevc@oriley.intel.com complains that

	i = 0;
	j = i++ + i++;

sets j to 0 instead of 1.

No bug here, the compiler is correct.  The language does not specify
the relative order of auto-increments and operand fetches.

  -=- Andrew Klossner   (uunet!tektronix!frip.WV.TEK!andrew)    [UUCP]
                        (andrew%frip.wv.tek.com@relay.cs.net)   [ARPA]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4737@orca.WV.TEK.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!shelby!apple!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!orca!frip!andrew

References: <8909272213.AA02132@oriley>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!shelby!apple!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!orca!frip!andrew
From: andrew@frip.WV.TEK.COM (Andrew Klossner)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
Subject: non-bug003 (order of auto-increment)
Message-ID: <4737@orca.WV.TEK.COM>
Date: 28 Sep 89 14:37:45 GMT
References: <8909272213.AA02132@oriley>
Sender: nobody@orca.WV.TEK.COM
Reply-To: andrew@frip.wv.tek.com
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville, Oregon
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message