🚀 go-pugleaf

I've been using g++ to run through a course book on c++ from AT&T.  I've found
one incompatibility with the AT&T version.

In the course text it clearly specifies that the "=" operator does not need to
be overloaded/defined for a class to itself.  It states that because of
the compatibility with C and C's ability to assign a structure to another,
it is not necessary to do that definition.  We do have an AT&T version on
another machine here and I did verify that was true.

For example, given a class:

    class String {

    public:
	...

    private:
	char text[128];
    }

it is possible in a program to:

    String a, b;

    a = b;

without defining the operator.  This doesn't work in g++ but does in the AT&T
version.

Not a biggie, but I thought I could report it anyway.

Dave Miller
Cray Research, Inc.