🚀 go-pugleaf

When trying to 'make LANGUAGES=c' on an IBM RS6000 running AIX, I got the 
following output:

> make LANGUAGES=c
>         rm -f tmplibgcc2.a
>         set -e; \
> 
>          for name in _muldi3 _divdi3 _moddi3 _udivdi3 _umoddi3 \
>               _negdi2 _lshrdi3 _lshldi3 _ashldi3 _ashrdi3 _udiv_w_sdiv \
>               _udivmoddi4 _cmpdi2 _ucmpdi2 _floatdidf _floatdisf \
>               _fixunsdfsi _fixunssfsi _fixunsdfdi _fixdfdi _fixunssfdi \
>               _fixsfdi __gc c_bcmp _varargs _eprintf _builtin_new \
>               _caps_New _builtin_del _bb _shtab _clear_cache _trampoline \
>               __main _exit _ctors; \
> 
>                 do \
>                   echo ${name}; \
>                   ./xgcc -B./ -O2  -DIN_GCC   -g  -g1 -I. -I. -I./config -c 
>                   -DL${name} ./libgcc2.c -o ${name}.o; \
>                   if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then true; else exit 1; fi; \
>                   ar rc tmplibgcc2.a ${name}.o; \
>                   rm -f ${name}.o; \
>                 done
> _muldi3
> Assembler:
> /tmp/ccG20Crx.s: line 33: 1252-142 Syntax error.
> make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1.
> 
> Make Quitting.

Is this related to the bug mentioned in in the AIX assembler that is
mentioned in the README.RS6000 file, or is it a bug in the compiler? Since
the README file only mentioned that the bug would occur when debugging code
compiled by gcc, I assumed that the compiler would compile itself whether I
have the patch or not (I don't know yet whether we do have the patch but I
suspect not). Please help. I would badly like to have gcc running on our
RS6000's. Thanks,

Cheers,                                         petcher@wuphys.wustl.edu
Don Petcher
Physics Department
Washington University
Saint Louis, MO 63130