🚀 go-pugleaf

I'm having a problem getting static objects to run correctly on HP903 or HP905
using g++ 2.7.2. The following code creates three static objects, which 
contain a single int Value. The values are printed, incremented and then 
printed again.  


The output should be and is correct on a Sun413 and Sun55 machine

BumStatic test

test1: a = 0
test1: b = 1
test1: c = 2
test2: a = 1
test2: b = 2
test2: c = 3

But is WRONG on an HP903 and HP905 machine.

BumStatic test

test1: a = 0
test1: b = 0
test1: c = 0
test2: a = 1
test2: b = 1
test2: c = 1

I have rebuilt the gcc/g++ compiler 2.72. and lib++ 2.71, and binutils 2.6 
for the HP903.


>>> Any suggestions on what I can do to get the code to work?


>>> For example, are there any known hppa type patches required, or environment
>>> that must exist when building the gcc compiler?




The following is the example code that fails on the HP:

#include <iostream.h>

class BumStatic {
  public:
    BumStatic() : Value( 0 ) {};
    BumStatic( int v ) : Value( v ) {};
    ~BumStatic() {};

    void ValueM( int v ) { Value = v; }
    int ValueM() { return Value; }

    int operator ++() { ++Value; }

  private:
    int Value;
};  //  end class BumStatic

static BumStatic a;
static BumStatic b( 1 );
static BumStatic c = 2;

main()
{
  const char *header = "\nBumStatic test\n";
  int va, vb, vc;

  cout << header << endl;

  va = a.ValueM();
  cout << "test1: a = " << va << endl;
  vb = b.ValueM();
  cout << "test1: b = " << vb << endl;
  vc = c.ValueM();
  cout << "test1: c = " << vc << endl;

  ++a;
  ++b;
  ++c;

  va = a.ValueM();
  cout << "test2: a = " << va << endl;
  vb = b.ValueM();
  cout << "test2: b = " << vb << endl;
  vc = c.ValueM();
  cout << "test2: c = " << vc << endl;
}  //  end main


-- 
Gary W. Hancock		             email:  garyh@chdasic.sps.mot.com
Motorola SPS ASIC APO