🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #41542

gcc new operator doesn't placement?

#41542
From: Mike Faulkner
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 00:00
8 lines
697 bytes
I'm trying to place an object at a given address using
the placement feature of new ( new (place) Class(...) )
but get the error message of too many arguments to new.

Am I doing something wrong or is this not supported with gcc?

TIA
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4imosl$i78@nwestmail.nwest.mccaw.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,f2200ad07c039dd5,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
From: mikef@sprewell.nwest.mccaw.com (Mike Faulkner)
Subject: gcc new operator doesn't  placement?
Date: 1996/03/19
Message-ID: <4imosl$i78@nwestmail.nwest.mccaw.com>
X-Deja-AN: 143173573
organization: AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
keywords: new, placement
reply-to: mike.faulkner@mccaw.com
newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help