🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #41855

Re: in solaris 2.5, which "ld" works with gcc better ?

#41855
From: Mark Evenson
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 00:00
14 lines
1220 bytes
In article <ZHAO.96Feb2184411@sparta.crl.nmsu.edu> zhao@crl.nmsu.edu
(Z. Zhao) writes:


   I have installed gcc 2.7.2 in a sparc/solaris 2.5 system. There is no
   native 'ld', I mean /usr/bin/ld, in solaris 2.5 as you know, but two
   old ld's : /usr/ccs/bin/ld and /usr/ucb/ld. Anybody knows Which one
   would work better with gcc ?

`/usr/ccs/bin/lib' is the standard static linker under Solaris 2.5.
'/usr/ucb/ld' should only be a front-end for some BSD compatibility mode.

Most of the development tools (`nm`, `make', `ld') are located under
`/usr/ccs' in Solaris 2.x.  
Technical Details
Message-ID: <m2ohrad7an.fsf@gravity.fly.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <ZHAO.96Feb2184411@sparta.crl.nmsu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,87dc9b5a578d0bb7
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-Thread: 11035d,87dc9b5a578d0bb7
X-Google-Attributes: gid11035d,public
From: evenson@gravity.fly.net (Mark Evenson)
Subject: Re: in solaris 2.5, which "ld" works with gcc better ?
Date: 1996/02/07
Message-ID: <m2ohrad7an.fsf@gravity.fly.net>
X-Deja-AN: 138409019
distribution: inet
sender: evenson@gravity.fly.net
references: <ZHAO.96Feb2184411@sparta.crl.nmsu.edu>
to: zhao@crl.nmsu.edu (Z. Zhao)
organization: fly.net, baby, @cafe in nyc
newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.unix.solaris