🚀 go-pugleaf

boutell@netcom.com (Thomas Boutell) writes:

> Am I the only one having serious problems with delete segfaulting
> on programs that worked fine with older versions of libg++?
> I've just built 2.5.1 for linux, and delete[] in particular seems
> to fail in situations that are verifiably correct.
>
> I'm still trying to come up with a short sample program to verify
> it. I also don't know if it's the fault of me, libg++ or
> the new Linux libc and patchlevel. So I'd appreciate feedback
> from those using libg++ 2.5.1 successfully on any architecture.
> 
> In particular, if you are using libg++ strings (the String class)
> successfully with libg++ 2.5.1, let me know-- I can't even get
> a program using those off the ground (it dies in the Regex::
> global constructor before main even kicks in). Probably a clue
> that my problems aren't due entirely to my own errors, since
> the String class can't get through the murk either.
> 
> Help!
Me too, me too.

I had some problems compiling flexfax on a Sun 4/470 using gcc-2.5.5 with
libg++-2.5.1. I traced the problems down to a call of 'new'. The adress
delivered was already in use by another class.

So there seem to be some problems with 'new'.

> -T
> -- 
> boutell@netcom.com, purveyor of fine HTML pages to the biology trade.

michael