Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #49824gcc 2.5.7 on IBM RS/6000 (was Re: What is the most recent reliable gcc?)
From: Deborah Parks
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1993 00:31
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1993 00:31
17 lines
1314 bytes
1314 bytes
In article <1993Dec18.235422.1989@Synopsys.Com> jbuck@synopsys.com (Joe Buck) writes: The newest release, 2.5.7, should be pretty solid except on the RS/6000, which has a nasty bug in the back end for the % (modulo) operator. Is this why I'm getting this error upon compiling libgcc2? xgcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 make: *** [libgcc2.a] Error 1 If so, is there a fix? Do I need to drop back a version or two? Thanks for any help. -Devin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DEVIN.93Dec20173159@benji.Colorado.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!boulder!cnsnews!devinReferences:
<CHz0xM.2M1@cuug.ab.ca> <1993Dec18.235422.1989@Synopsys.Com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11318c,17516ac00311af8b X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-12-20 17:24:35 PST Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!boulder!cnsnews!devin From: devin@benji.Colorado.EDU (Deborah Parks) Subject: gcc 2.5.7 on IBM RS/6000 (was Re: What is the most recent reliable gcc?) In-Reply-To: jbuck@synopsys.com's message of Sat, 18 Dec 1993 23:54:22 GMT Message-ID: <DEVIN.93Dec20173159@benji.Colorado.EDU> Sender: usenet@cnsnews.Colorado.EDU (Net News Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: benji.colorado.edu Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder References: <CHz0xM.2M1@cuug.ab.ca> <1993Dec18.235422.1989@Synopsys.Com> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1993 00:31:59 GMT Lines: 17