🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #49824

gcc 2.5.7 on IBM RS/6000 (was Re: What is the most recent reliable gcc?)

#49824
From: Deborah Parks
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1993 00:31
17 lines
1314 bytes
In article <1993Dec18.235422.1989@Synopsys.Com> jbuck@synopsys.com (Joe Buck) writes:

   The newest release, 2.5.7, should be pretty solid except on the
   RS/6000, which has a nasty bug in the back end for the % (modulo)
   operator.

Is this why I'm getting this error upon compiling libgcc2?

xgcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6
make: *** [libgcc2.a] Error 1

If so, is there a fix?  Do I need to drop back a version or two?

Thanks for any help.

			-Devin
Technical Details
Message-ID: <DEVIN.93Dec20173159@benji.Colorado.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!boulder!cnsnews!devin
References: <CHz0xM.2M1@cuug.ab.ca> <1993Dec18.235422.1989@Synopsys.Com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,17516ac00311af8b
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-12-20 17:24:35 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!boulder!cnsnews!devin
From: devin@benji.Colorado.EDU (Deborah Parks)
Subject: gcc 2.5.7 on IBM RS/6000 (was Re: What is the most recent reliable gcc?)
In-Reply-To: jbuck@synopsys.com's message of Sat, 18 Dec 1993 23:54:22 GMT
Message-ID: <DEVIN.93Dec20173159@benji.Colorado.EDU>
Sender: usenet@cnsnews.Colorado.EDU (Net News Administrator)
Nntp-Posting-Host: benji.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
References: <CHz0xM.2M1@cuug.ab.ca> <1993Dec18.235422.1989@Synopsys.Com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1993 00:31:59 GMT
Lines: 17