🚀 go-pugleaf

dweller@NeoSoft.com (David Weller) writes:

>Sorry for the repost (if that is the case).  Somebody told me
>I had the "Distribution" set up wrong.  Let's see if I get a better
>response this time:
>
>Apologies in advance if this is a FA(s)Q:  I'm using long long int
>for some of my work (need to manipulate a 64bit string to do
>some kinky stuff with doubles).  I've encountered several
>quirky behaviours: 1) It doesn't seem to care much for simple
>assignment (it's almost like the upper 4 bytes get dropped),
>2) It doesn't seem to care much for standard operators (like
>& and ^), and 3) I can't seem to find any reasonable documentation
>on this "special" type
>
>Can anybody help this poor soul?

No, given a vague description like "it doesn't seem to care much for ...",
it's almost guaranteed that no-one will be able to help you.
If you think there is a bug, then submit a bug report (after
carefully reading the instructions in the gcc manual on how to submit
bug reports).  Without some example code and a clearer description
of exactly what you think is wrong, there's not much anyone can do.

-- 
Fergus Henderson                     fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU