🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2cboj4$e4m@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> skelley@birch.ee.vt.edu writes:
>Hi,
>	Have you used "strip" to remove the debugging
>information from your executables? By default, the libg++
>is compiled with the "-g" option which adds ~250KB to
>every executable on our Sparcs [I now compile libg++ 
>without the "-g" option]. Sean.

I've been waiting a week for a response to this question- I appreciate
your efforts. As I explained, I only get a huge
library when I compile the files separately; catting them together
and compiling them as one .cc file produces a tiny library.
Not only that, but this is *library* size, before linking,
so the size of libg++ hasn't even been factored in yet.

All I'm trying to find out is whether gcc 2.5.x improves the
template expansion size situation or not. Anybody know?

-T
-- 
i'll be under the floorboards with my face in the sun