Re: What object format works best for debugging?

Article View: gnu.gcc.help

Article #50197

#50197

From: Charles Wilson
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1993 19:56

13 lines
1080 bytes

In article <9310121747.AA23306@ndc.com> derway@ndc.com (Don Erway) writes:
>
>I feel strongly that the tool chain should support target
>processors, with "optimal", (for gcc), or at least
>un-arbitrarily-constrained-by-backwards-compatibility,
>configurations.
>
Don,

I'm not sure I follow you on this.  What exactly is it that you
feel is missing?  What would be an "optimal" configuration?

Charlie

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5839@crl.LABS.TEK.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!news.tek.com!crl!sunshine!charliew

References: <9310121747.AA23306@ndc.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,a46156a3d26949e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-10-12 14:17:10 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!news.tek.com!crl!sunshine!charliew
From: charliew@sunshine.LABS.TEK.COM (Charles Wilson)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: What object format works best for debugging?
Message-ID: <5839@crl.LABS.TEK.COM>
Date: 12 Oct 93 19:56:18 GMT
References: <9310121747.AA23306@ndc.com>
Sender: news@crl.LABS.TEK.COM
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Computer Research Laboratory, Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton OR
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message