Re: (none)

Article View: gnu.gcc.help

Article #508

#508

From: Jonathan M Lennox
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 04:14

12 lines
1133 bytes

In article <9209252005.AA02289@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman) writes:
>I plan to keep supporting GCC version 1, aiming for reliable
>compilation of correct programs, until version 2 is no longer
>considered beta test.

  Which reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask--what is the
criterion for considering gcc 2 to be out of beta test?  Surely "when
all the bugs are gone" is not reasonable, but what will the threshhold
be?

Jonathan Lennox
jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep28.041455.2824@news.columbia.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!jml12

References: <9209251843.AA23057@dingo.cs.wisc.edu> <9209252005.AA02289@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!jml12
From: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Subject: Re: (none)
Message-ID: <1992Sep28.041455.2824@news.columbia.edu>
Sender: usenet@news.columbia.edu (The Network News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
Reply-To: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Organization: Columbia University
References: <9209251843.AA23057@dingo.cs.wisc.edu> <9209252005.AA02289@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Distribution: gnu
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 04:14:55 GMT
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message