Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #50975Versions
From: Tim McDaniel
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1993 23:19
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1993 23:19
21 lines
1701 bytes
1701 bytes
I've only read the articles available on my machine, which is about two
days' worth, so my apologies if this is in an FAQ or is a commonly-asked
question.
We have a slightly hacked version 2.3.1 here. I archied around and
found versions 2.3.3 and 2.4.5 of gcc. The machine I'd like to run gcc
on is an HP 9000/715 (a 1.1 version, I think). uname -a says
HP-UX dave A.09.01 A 9000/715 ... two-user license
so I suppose it's running HP-UX 9.01. I don't have any time to worry
about maintaining gcc itself.
How stable are versions 2.3.1, 2.3.3, and 2.4.5 for HP-UX 9.01? All of
their READMEs call themselves "beta version"s. Does -g work much at all
for any of them?
Please E-MAIL to me and I'll summarize.
--
Tim McDaniel, Convex Computer Corporation, Richardson, TX
mcdaniel@convex.com, mcdaniel@mozart.convex.com, mcdaniel@cyberspace.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jul16.231921.420@news.eng.convex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!convex!convex!mcdanielShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,ced64b9c9ff05259,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-07-16 16:34:39 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!convex!convex!mcdaniel
From: mcdaniel@convex.com (Tim McDaniel)
Subject: Versions
Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account)
Message-ID: <1993Jul16.231921.420@news.eng.convex.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1993 23:19:21 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: mozart.convex.com
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
not necessarily those of CONVEX.
Lines: 21