Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #51560gcc vs. cc
From: Jingwen Wang
Date: Tue, 04 May 1993 17:59
Date: Tue, 04 May 1993 17:59
33 lines
1668 bytes
1668 bytes
After working for years on cc, now I am moving to ansi C. It was said that
ansi C is a lot more strict in error checking, so it is desirable for large
complicated code development. However, I was immediately frustrated when
I started using gcc: The vendors do not make their header files Ansi C
compliant and we end up with hacking around to avoid the warning messages.
Even worse, when I moved the code from one sun environment to another, the
whole thing breaks again and I have to "port" from one sun environment to
another.
Is gcc a serious thing or just something for people to play with? Why
does the vendor do not care about the Ansi C too much? Is ansi C an easy
to use thing (or a practical thing) on most workstations? How do you guys
feel like? I am a kind of doulbtful whether we should stick to gcc or go
back to cc.
Thanks.
jwang
--
Jingwen Wang
Computer Systems Research Institute
University of Toronto
6 Kings College Road
Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S 1A1
--
Jingwen Wang
Computer Systems Research Institute
University of Toronto
6 Kings College Road
Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S 1A1
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993May4.135911.2947@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!sys.toronto.edu!jwangShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11318c,5a7dc4a3782e8423 X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-05-04 11:19:39 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!sys.toronto.edu!jwang Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help From: jwang@sys.toronto.edu (Jingwen Wang) Subject: gcc vs. cc Message-ID: <1993May4.135911.2947@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto Date: 4 May 93 17:59:11 GMT Lines: 34