Robustocity of 2.x

Article View: gnu.gcc.help

Article #51602

#51602

From: Eric W. Sink
Date: Fri, 07 May 1993 16:37

13 lines
1052 bytes

How robust and reliable are the latest 2.x releases at this point?

Is 2.x still considered beta?

Compared to 1.42?

thanks,

-- 
Eric W. Sink, Spyglass        | "In all the earth, only humans have the ability
1800 Woodfield Drive          |    to be content in bad situations...
Savoy, IL  61826              |    and vice-versa."
---- e-sink@uiuc.edu ---------|---------- 217-355-6000 -----------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C6o0ty.650@news.cso.uiuc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!ira.uka.de!howland.reston.ans.net!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!ux2.cso.uiuc.edu!sink

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,2622c531c5379df4,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-05-07 15:36:23 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!ira.uka.de!howland.reston.ans.net!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!ux2.cso.uiuc.edu!sink
From: e-sink@uiuc.edu (Eric W. Sink)
Subject: Robustocity of 2.x
Date: Fri, 7 May 1993 16:37:10 GMT
Message-ID: <C6o0ty.650@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner)
Reply-To: e-sink@uiuc.edu
Originator: sink@ux2.cso.uiuc.edu
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 13