Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #51645gcc compared, and used for production
From: karl
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1993 14:55
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1993 14:55
19 lines
1601 bytes
1601 bytes
Some people here are eager to switch to gcc ``for real''; others are not so sure. I've seen some articles (a while back) comparing gcc performance to acc (I think) and Sun's regular cc. Naturally, I neglected to save them :-( If anyone could send them to me, or has such numbers themselves, I'd be most appreciative. I'm particularly interested in gcc vs. acc and gcc vs. the HP-UX 9 cc, but anything would be useful. Also, if you know of (or work for?) companies that use the stock FSF gcc as their production compiler for product development, I'd like to hear about that, too. (Besides Lucid and Cygnus; and Data General/Intel/NeXT/etc. -- those are all useful points, and I'm making them, but what would be most convincing is a company making some big end-user application, as opposed to tools.) Thanks in advance. I'll summarize if warranted. karl@hq.ileaf.com (wearing my Interleaf hat today)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9304291317.AA03304@owl.HQ.Ileaf.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic!lunic!eru.mt.luth.se!enterpoop.mit.edu!deccrl!decwrl!decwrl!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!owl.HQ.ILeaf.COM!karlShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11318c,fb8d48c2b995599e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-04-29 08:33:23 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic!lunic!eru.mt.luth.se!enterpoop.mit.edu!deccrl!decwrl!decwrl!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!owl.HQ.ILeaf.COM!karl From: karl@owl.HQ.ILeaf.COM Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help Subject: gcc compared, and used for production Message-ID: <9304291317.AA03304@owl.HQ.Ileaf.COM> Date: 29 Apr 93 14:55:35 GMT Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Reply-To: karl@hq.ileaf.com Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 19