Re: building gcc2.3.3 under Solaris 2.1

Article View: gnu.gcc.help

Article #51762

#51762

From: Richard Stallman
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1993 21:55

10 lines
1124 bytes

    Has the requirement that the libgcc1.a file *NOT* be compiled with gcc been
    relaxed?

I think you've misunderstood something.  This requirement is not a
decision.  It is an inevitable consequence of how the code is
written.  We cannot "relax" it, unless you find some other way to
implement this.

libgcc1.a is supposed to implement the operations that GCC cannot open-code.
If you compile it with GCC, each function will be an infinite recursion.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9304122149.AA26733@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms

References: <9304122041.AA05927@jester.vuse>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,d4e7f81e75443d84
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-04-12 15:33:24 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms
From: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: building gcc2.3.3 under Solaris 2.1
Date: 12 Apr 1993 17:55:38 -0400
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 11
Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Message-ID: <9304122149.AA26733@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
References: <9304122041.AA05927@jester.vuse>

Reply to Parent Message