🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <C1vppK.132@pronto.mh.nl> jv@mh.nl (Johan Vromans) writes:

>I have been supplied with some minor patches that are needed to get
>GCC working on Alpha/OSF. I have attachted them to this message.

>XThe Free Software Foundation recently released 
>XGCC version 2.3.3, which includes support for
>XAlpha AXP platforms running OSF/1.
>X
>XThere are three problems with the kit available directly
>Xfrom the FSF on the internet.  All of these are corrected
>Xin the DEC internal kit described in the previous note, but here are
>Xthe detailed changes.
>X
>X1)  wrong version stamp for BL10
>X
>XThe OSF compiler system is unhappy because gcc creates assembler
>Xfiles marked for BL9.  To fix this, edit config/alpha.h
>Xat line 1259.
>X
>X*** gcc-2.3.3/config/alpha.h~	Wed Jan  6 09:26:20 1993
>X--- gcc-2.3.3/config/alpha.h	Thu Jan 14 13:42:33 1993

>X2)  GCC bug in genemit.c
>X
>XThis problem is an unitialized return variable, which prevents
>Xthe compiler from building correctly under BL10.
>X
>X*** gcc-2.3.3/genemit.c~	Tue Oct 13 05:11:52 1992
>X--- gcc-2.3.3/genemit.c	Thu Jan 14 13:42:30 1993

>X3) GCC bug in calling sequence for division and remainder
>X
>X*** gcc-2.3.3/config/alpha.md~	Wed Jan  6 09:26:21 1993
>X--- gcc-2.3.3/config/alpha.md	Thu Jan 14 13:42:31 1993

I applied these patches and compiled the three stages but 'make compare'
failed for echo .o file.

make LANGUAGES=c XCFLAGS=-O0 LIBGCC2_CFLAGS=
make stage1
make CC="stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/" CFLAGS= LIBGCC2_CFLAGS= LANGUAGES=c
make stage2
make CC="stage2/xgcc -Bstage2/" CFLAGS= LIBGCC2_CFLAGS= LANGUAGES=c
make compare

If I make a stage4 or even stage5 'make compare' produces the same output.

Any hint?

Christoph Martin