Re: anyone got glibc running under solaris 2.1?

Article View: gnu.gcc.help

Article #52112

#52112

From: Kevin Rodgers
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1993 18:07

14 lines
1545 bytes

In article <1993Feb2.194137.21783@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> heath@iceblink.cs.jhu.edu (Dave Heath) writes:
>I have tried to compile (with gcc 2.3.3) glibc under solaris 2.1, but
>ran into lots of problems. Has anyone got this to work? Is there any
>word when solaris 2.1 will be supported for glibc?

What standard C library facilities does Solaris provide?  (I am under
the impression it includes both ANSI C and POSIX libraries and headers.)

[Note: followups to comp.unix.solaris]
-- 
Kevin Rodgers				kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com
Martin Marietta MS A16401		(303) 790-3971
116 Inverness Dr. East
Englewood CO 80112 USA			GO BUFFS!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Feb3.180721.26593@den.mmc.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!gumby!yale!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!news.den.mmc.com!traffic!kevin

References: <1993Feb2.194137.21783@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,6e6454c958c00e12
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-Thread: 11035d,3b3491fd618c166e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid11035d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-03 10:07:21 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.unix.solaris
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!gumby!yale!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!news.den.mmc.com!traffic!kevin
From: kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers)
Subject: Re: anyone got glibc running under solaris 2.1?
Message-ID: <1993Feb3.180721.26593@den.mmc.com>
Followup-To: comp.unix.solaris
Sender: news@den.mmc.com (News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: traffic.den.mmc.com
Organization: Martin Marietta Western Internal Systems, Technical Operations
References: <1993Feb2.194137.21783@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1993 18:07:21 GMT
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message